Posted by Jim Andrew and Hal Sirkin on June 13, 2007 11:31 AMJim Andrew and Hal Sirkin are Senior Partners and Managing Directors of The Boston Consulting Group and coauthors of Payback: Reaping the Rewards of Innovation.If you read recent cover stories in BusinessWeek and the Economist, you might conclude that Apple is the ultimate innovator. And you might be right. The company has reinvented itself multiple times and in the process has already transformed at least two industries — personal computing and digital music. What will be the impact of the iPhone? While there are no certainties, “major” seems to be a safe bet.So — is Apple’s continued innovation leadership a foregone conclusion? Not necessarily. As good as its track record has been, like every great innovator, Apple has had its share of mishaps, too. More fundamentally, our experience (as reflected in our book, Payback) tells us that there are many keys to long-term innovation success for any company — and very few organizations manage to maintain success for extended periods of time. First, innovation leadership needs to come from the very top, across generations. “From the top” isn’t a problem at Apple — obviously. But Apple will have to face the generational challenge at some point. Steve Jobs has been in charge for virtually decades. Who are the other Apple innovation leaders? How will a future, Job-less Apple continue to innovate at the same high level?Long-term innovation leaders make sure that the entire organization is aligned to support innovation. Again, no problem for Apple right now — but it’s easy for organizations to get out of alignment, slowly, incrementally, as other goals and priorities creep in. As long as Jobs is firmly in the saddle and the product set stays limited there’s less cause to worry — but with other leadership, and as Apple acquires more partners with agendas of their own, and the product line continues to extend, the focus may soften.Finally, long-term innovators are humble. They’re always looking out — watching competitors, listening to customers, picking up on trends — and finding ways to turn ideas into cash payback, which is the real test of innovation success. And innovation isn’t just about ideas — it’s about using ideas to generate incremental profit. Any company that falls in love with its cover stories — and with its ideas as opposed to its execution — is in danger of becoming an innovation also-ran. So far, Apple has successfully avoided this but it’s happened before — just ask any number of formerly “great innovators” who have fallen from grace. So, best of luck, Apple — but be careful out there.
June 21, 2007
June 6, 2007
Conquering the Challenges of Managing a Data Center
Understanding the key challenges
52 % of the respondents said that ensuring high availability was the most challenging task for them. Around 24 % respondents said capacity planning was their key concern. While 10 % of the respondents primarily faced issues like keeping costs under control, the remaining 14 % said ensuring optimal utilization of resources was their prime challenge. To ensure high availability, you need to have redundant power backup. Secondly, data center should adopt network load balancing along with DR so that stress on the data center can be minimized. For the critical applications running in your data center, also you should have an automatic fail-over setup. Build redundancy into all the possible elements that can affect high availability, for example, switches and routers. If you think, you don’t have enough trained staff to provide high availability then better outsource the management of your critical apps. To combat the issue of capacity planning, one of the options suggested by some of our respondents was server consolidation. One of the requirements for doing a successful server consolidation is monitoring your IT resources and then formulating the strategy. Broadly speaking, server consolidation translates into IT resource management. If you think that your current data canter can’t take load of your upcoming projects then only you should revamp your data center (DC) or if you don’t have enough time and budget then outsourced DC would be a better option. Virtualization is another solution for capacity planning. It taps the unused processing power of the servers in your data center. Moreover, with virtualization, you can add more apps in the same environment in order to utilize unused server power for efficient resource management. This will also help other concerns like ensuring optimal utilization of resources and keeping costs under control.
Key management concerns
Power concerns top the list, followed by crash and recovery. There are also connectivity related, cooling and data backup issues. Let’s take these issues one by one. Yes, power is the basic need for a huge data center, moreover as your data center grows you would require more electricity in order to power your infrastructure. Here also, capacity planning plays a major role. One has to evaluate the present and future power requirements for a data center. Then deploy a power conditioning system for your DC, which includes UPS and indigenous power generation unit. These days, many organizations have their own power generation units for powering their data center grid. Next you may face crash recovery issues. For instance, if any of your mission critical applications fail due to hardware failure then what would be your recovery strategy to bring back the application with minimum down time. In that case, keep your hardware and spares ready in stock, so that you can just replace the hardware and host the application on a new piece of hardware. Connectivity issues are another common area of concern that CIOs face, while managing their data centers. In fact, one interesting aspect that came up from our survey was availability of network equipment. What if one switch fails somewhere in your large data center? How quickly would you be abe to find and rectify it before something disasterous happens? For this, you need real time monitoring of the networking equipment and failover support for the most critical ones. Data centers have a lot of servers and other equipment that generate huge amount of heat as well. As the temperature rises, it adversely affects the performance of the data center, plus chances of wear and tear of equipment also increase. Therefore, cooling plays a very important part in your DC. Before building a DC, you need to analyze your cooling requirements and design your DC accordingly. For your existing data center, you should put in temperature monitoring and control equipment. One of the respondents said that for additional cooling on demand, you can also deploy emergency chillers.
Conquering the Challenges of Managing a Data Center
Ensuring high availability is the biggest challenge faced by CIOs while managing their data center and about 50% of them have outsourced some of the monitoring and management to a third party. Here we explore these and other data center mgmt challenges in detail | ||||
Sanjay Majumder Over the last few years, we have seen the number of data centers growing at an exceptional rate. The term data center brings to mind a picture of a highly secure room spread over acres of land, with organized cabling infrastructure, extreme cooling and dedicated power house. Well, in reality things are slightly different. A data center, in simple terms is nothing but a place that holds your data, IT infrastructure and applications. In the early days, there was no term called ‘data center’, as such. There were server rooms where all the servers were kept and managed by an expert IT team. With the ‘Dot com’ boom, emphasis on datacenter has risen at a phenomenal rate. Initially, these data center facilities were constructed by ISPs for hosting applications, servers etc, for their clients. These days, each and every enterprise has its own data center in place. But on the other hand the complexity of managing these data centers efficiently has also become a challenge for the CIO. Therefore, we decided to find out the key data center management issues faced by CIOs and try to find answers for them. For this, we interacted with 28 key CIOS from across the country.
Understanding the key challenges Key management concerns |
||||
© Source: PCQuest |
June 4, 2007
‘The future need is for mobile business management’
‘The future need is for mobile business management’ | |||||||||||
N Chandrasekaran, GM- IT, Ashok Leyland speaks about challenges from vendors and service providers, and IT infrastructure plans including a DR center in Hosur | |||||||||||
N Chandrasekaran, who spearheads the IT strategies at Ashok Leyland, the Indian flagship of the Hinduja Group, is planning to roll out, with the help of HP, a Score Card system based on Oracle to address performance measurement and incentivization of dealerships. In an interview with VOICE&DATA, Chandrasekaran, spoke about challenges from vendors and service providers, while sharing plans relating to IT infrastructure including a disaster recovery center at HosurAshok Leyland has been investing heavily in IT infrastructure. What are your future investments? Enterprise transaction processes cover our end-to-end needs of business, used by over 3,000 users, with an average concurrency of 1,100 and peak concurrency of 1,500. With multiple manufacturing units focusing on different activities, it is a challenge to have the ERP address business and operational needs effectively and efficiently, and this is something we have ensured in the way we have architected and integrated. We are currently rolling out what we have named “Customer Connect”-an initiative that provides an integrated business solution with CRM and Dealer Management processes. The PLM solution based on Matrix One that we are implementing is an effective aid in providing customer value enhancements, and is integrated with the other initiatives towards achieving this.What is the focus of the disaster recovery back-up project? Can it ensure real time recovery? |
June 1, 2007
Ensuring Data Integrity in SANs
|
|||||||
With all organizational data moving into SANs, their security is becoming a growing concern. Here we look at a few technologies to make them more secure | |||||||
Monday, June 04, 2007 SANs have numerous benefits in an enterprise setup, as they create an aggregated pool of storage for the organization. But such a storage pool that’s accessible to all may become a liability unless well thought out security policies are framed and made a part of the storage area network. Traditionally, SANs were deployed for a subset of a single data center, that is, a small isolated network and, therefore, were inherently more secure. But, today it is commonplace to find a SAN that spans outside a data center for business continuance and disaster recovery purposes. Moreover, with the advent of technologies such as iSCSI and FCIP, which use vulnerable TCP/IP for the transport, the need to secure SANs has become more evident. In this article, we’ll discuss SAN security. Understanding threats
In the SAN switches for instance, remove the operator privileges so that nobody has complete control, and use role-based authentication instead. Likewise, ensure that there are no overlapping domain Ids, which can otherwise result in configuration errors. A correctly configured switch can help prevent both deliberate and unintentional disruptions. Besides securing the SAN fabric, there are many other technologies available for securing the SAN better. Let’s have a look at them.Zoning |
|||||||
© Source: PCQuest |
May 5, 2007
The ‘Bird of Gold’ : The rise of India’s consumer market
Private equity and venture capital funds have been betting on Indian domestic consumption story for a year or two now. They have reasons to believe that they are on the right path. No less than McKinsey Global Institute has concluded that India will be one of the world’s largest consumer markets by 2025. A survey by MGI – titled The ‘Bird of Gold’: The rise of India’s consumer market – said that India will catapult to the fifth largest consumption market by 2025 from the current 12th rank.
But there is a caveat. The country has to sustain and accelerate the economic growth (the study is based on the assumption that GDP growth will grow at an average compounded growth of 7.3 per cent a year).
So what does it mean? By 2025, India’s middle class may have multiplied 12 times, to reach 583 million from the current 50 million. Not just that, there will be over real “wealthy” 23 million Indians, while the number of the poor will drop from 54 per cent of the population in 2005 to 22 per cent by 2025.
The study forecasts that aggregate consumption in India will grow fourfold in real terms, from Rs 17 trillion at present to Rs 70 trillion by 2025. Essentially, the Indian income levels will almost triple.
What Will They Spend On
The study says the expenditure on foods, beverage and tobacco will see a remarkable drop as a proportion to overall expenditure by 2025. They may remain the single largest category in terms of spend, but their share will drop to 25 per cent from 42 per cent.
So who will benefit? Transport (aviation, anyone?) and healthcare will be the second and third biggest markets by then, according to the study. Communication will grow the fastest – at 13 per cent a year on an aggregate basis. See the graph on the right.
You can download the full report here.
# source: The ‘Bird of Gold’ : The rise of India’s consumer market, McKinsey Global Institue, 3rd May 2007.
November 29, 2006
Inside the Mind of the Chinese Consumer
Key ideas from the Harvard Business Review article by William McEwen, Xiaoguang Fang, Chuanping Zhang, and Richard Burkholder
The Idea
Ever since China emerged from its Maoist cocoon, companies around the globe have been clamoring to do business in or with China. But too many of them don’t understand Chinese companies and consumers. Western executives, in particular, wrongly view China as merely a giant production factory peopled by eager, engaged workers—or a giant, monolithic population starving for basic consumer goods. The consequences? Western companies risk stumbling badly when they try partnering with Chinese firms or selling their wares to Chinese consumers.How to avoid these risks? Develop an accurate portrait of who the Chinese people really are and how they’re changing—so you base strategic decisions on facts, not myths. And the facts may surprise you. For example, contrary to most Westerners’ beliefs, Chinese workers want more than just a job and salary: they desire recognition for their efforts and opportunities to grow. And Chinese consumers want to do more than just clean their homes and cook their food: they yearn to tantalize their tastes and to be seen as au courant in their choice of products.By replacing misconceptions with facts, you deepen your understanding of what Chinese people really want. And you develop business strategies that successfully meet those demands—before your competitors can.
The Idea in Practice
To successfully do business in or with China, acquire accurate information about the country’s workers and consumers.WorkersConsumers
October 24, 2006
Strategies That Fit Emerging Markets
Key ideas from the Harvard Business Review article by Tarun Khanna, Krishna G. Palepu, and Jayant Sinha
The Idea
What’s the fastest-growing market in the world for most products and services? Developing countries. Yet many companies shy away from doing business in these nations. CEOs are all too aware that such countries lack the market institutions needed to do business successfully—such as consumer-data experts, end-to-end logistics providers, and talent search firms.But avoid investing in developing countries, and you won’t remain competitive for long. How to mitigate the risks? As authors Khanna, Palepu, and Sinha recommend, first analyze each country’s institutional context, including political and social systems; openness to foreign investment; and quality of product, labor, and capital markets.Then decide: Should you work around your target country’s institutional weaknesses? Create new market infrastructures (for example, your own in-country supply chain)? Or stay away because adapting your business model would be impractical or uneconomical?Dell Computer chose to adapt its business model to enter China. After discovering that Chinese consumers didn’t buy over the Internet (a cornerstone of Dell’s North American business model), Dell sold its products through Chinese distributors and systems integrators.Correctly diagnose developing countries’ institutional contexts, and you make savvier foreign-investment decisions. You avoid markets you can’t profitably serve—while capturing the wealth of opportunities presented by other emerging markets.
The Idea in Practice
Diagnose Institutional ContextsDecide Your StrategyBased on your target’s institutional context, decide whether you’ll:• Adapt your business model: Ensure that changes to your model preserve your competitive advantage. Example: In the U.S., McDonald’s outsources supply chain operations. But when it tried to enter Russia, it couldn’t find local suppliers. So, with help from its joint venture partner, it identified farmers it could work with and advanced them money so they could invest in seeds and equipment. And it sent Russian managers to Canada for training. By establishing its own supply chain and management systems, it now controls 80% of the Russian fast-food market.• Change the institutional context: A powerful company’s products or services can force dramatic improvements in local markets. For example, when Big Four audit firms set up branches in Brazil, their presence raised country-wide financial-reporting and auditing standards. That in turn gave multinationals with Brazilian subsidiaries access to global-quality audit services. • Stay away: If adapting your business model is impractical, avoid investing. Example: Home Depot’s value proposition (low prices, great service, good quality) hinges on many U.S.-specific institutions—including reliable transportation networks to minimize inventory and employee stock ownership to motivate workers to provide top-notch service. It avoids countries with weak logistics systems and poorly developed capital markets, where it would have difficulty using its inventory management system and may not be able to use employee stock ownership.
March 1, 2005
The Great Transition
Key ideas from the Harvard Business Review article by
The Idea
Foreign firms’ opportunities in China are astounding—but so are the perils. With China now in the World Trade Organization, foreign businesses can—for the first time—pursue the Chinese domestic market. And it’s worth pursuing. China’s dazzling economic growth shows no sign of stopping. And thanks to improvements in China’s infrastructure, workforce, and regulatory environment, multinationals (in particular) have unprecedented opportunities to lower their costs and reap new regional and global competitive advantages. But doing business in China is more dynamic and complex than ever. A sampling of the perils: • The Chinese leaders who negotiated the WTO agreement consulted very little with those most affected by it—industrial ministries, provinces, and cities where foreign competition could threaten local business. Result? Few localities are prepared to implement WTO obligations, preferring instead to stimulate local economic growth and reduce foreign competition. China’s intellectual property protections, for example, are often impossible to enforce. • Constantly changing regulations, bureaucracies, and reporting relationships—and continued government involvement in commerce—hamper business planning. • China’s newest leaders must handle competing demands among China’s shaky banking system, health and other public services, environmental needs, and cash-strapped local governments. Managing these risks is particularly critical if your firm has already entered the China market and is beginning to more fully establish its brands, cultivate markets, and expand geographically. Use the following guidelines to leverage the opportunities—and manage the risks.
The Idea in Practice
Nest your China effort within your whole organization.
Business-unit autonomy doesn’t work well in China because the government treats corporations as single entities. Show “one face” by establishing a first-rate country office that participates in all new-venture negotiations, national-level government relations, and strategic planning for the China effort. Establish a corporate identity that highlights compatibility between your company’s goals and the country’s goals. This identity can help you obtain critical licenses and regulatory decisions.
Tailor strategies for the national level and each locality.
Chinese localities differ in the quality of their government and workforces, experience with international business practices, regulatory environment, consumer tastes, and domination by state-owned or private enterprises. Identify differences in each locality and develop the expertise to lobby government at every level—for example, persuading local governments to bring criminal charges against trademark violations.
Be wary of joint ventures.
Joint ventures—formerly the only way to operate in China—are can present problems for foreign venturers. Government officials often promote ailing Chinese companies as venture candidates, and most Chinese firms want to dominate their local markets and then take profits out rather than reinvest them. Consider establishing an independent legal entity—a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (WFOE)—which can provide management control and better protection of intellectual property rights.
Limit the risks of operating in China.
Hire or develop experts who can penetrate the Chinese system enough to recognize when social tensions are growing, understand internally contested issues, and devise strategies for moving critical regulatory decisions forward. Remember that no place is safe from natural or political disaster—so don’t put all your company’s resources for critical operations into China. Keep one sensitive part of your production processes outside China, to prevent pirating. Periodically assess the risks of your China operations so you can quickly move some operations elsewhere if necessary.
Avoid irrational exuberance about China.
Like items in a shop window, China’s attractions are changing over time. Each opportunity carries different investment and management implications. Rather than rushing to plant the flag, sort through the operational consequences of your different efforts. Pinpoint why you want to do business in China, where to locate there, and what might best be done elsewhere.